Time Synchronization

Time Synchronization
News & Tutorials from Meinberg
  • PTP / IEEE 1588
  • NTP
  • Configuration Guidelines
  • Industry Applications
  • Security
Home » Uncategorized » PTP Telecom Profile in Power Grids

PTP Telecom Profile in Power Grids

January 23, 2019 by Andreja Jarc 1 Comment

Five Minute Facts About Packet Timing

By Andreja Jarc.

Synchronization in Power Networks

There are a few different timing technologies which are used for synchronization in power grids. Traditional power systems use IRIG-B which can deliver from 1 us to a few micro seconds accuracy, depending on whether you are using the TTL or AM version. The main drawbacks of IRIG-B is that it requires dedicated cabling for timing, and network delays are not automatically calibrated.

With the Network Time Protocol (NTP), due to fact that it is a two-way timing protocol, the network delays are calibrated automatically. In addition, NTP uses the data network which is more efficient in terms of cabling than IRIG-B. However, it can achieve only about 1ms typical accuracy.

On the other hand, PTP (Precision Time Protocol) delivers the best of IRIG-B and NTP: 100 ns to 1us of accuracy within a substation. Moreover, PTP does automatic network calibration and it uses the data network, therefore no extra cables are needed to transfer the time.

PTP in Substations

PTP Time in substations is distributed using power profiles. There are two profiles defined for power applications: IEC 61850-9-3 Utility Profile and the IEEE C37.238 Power Profile. Both profiles are almost identical with a few special settings in the Power Profile. They are designed for Layer-2 networks, either Ethernet, HSR or PRP. For details on HSR and PRP please refer to one of our previous posts. They use the Peer Delay measurement mechanism; therefore all switches need to have PTP support and are either transparent clocks or boundary clocks.

See also  Performance Level Options for the Meinberg HPS100 card

PTP can be used also to transfer timing from substation to substation. In this case the communication goes to an adjacent substation or to a SCADA network and the Substation gets timing from there. Such PTP inter-grid network can serve also as a failover in case of GPS failing or jamming.

Telecom Profile PTP for Inter-grid Network

For inter-grid network time transfer they would commonly use a Telecom Profile PTP (for example ITU-T G8275.2), because the inter-substation network is usually based on telecom technology. Basically, it is like a telecom network.

Some power grids are even using the Telecom Profile only, because within a substation they still have an IRIG-B network and will keep using that. In this case they need a device that can take PTP as an input signal from the external network and deliver IRIG out, and sometimes also NTP to a data network in a substation.

Figure 1: Inter-grid communication between substations via a telecom network and the Power Profile PTP within a substation.

Configuration with a Meinberg System

The Meinberg IMS (Intelligent Modular Synchronization) M3000 System can do such PTP translation between the Telecom and Power Profile. To do this, the system needs two separate PTP Cards. One PTP card is configured as a slave and is running the ITU-T G8275.2 Telecom Profile. The second card is configured as a master and is running the Power IEEE C37.238 or optionally the IEC 61850-9-3 Utility Profile. Depends which profile is used within a substation.

Let me show you how you can configure this setup in a LANTIME V6 Web GUI.

Figure 2: PTP Card 1, Configuration of the Slave with the Telecom Profile ITU-T G.8275-2.
Figure 3: PTP Card 2, Configuration of the Master with the Power Profile IEEE C37.238-2011.

At this point, I would like to acknowledge my colleague Dr. Doug Arnold for his valuable technical contribution in the topic.

See also  Telecom Profile With Full On-Path Support

If you have a question about PTP or you need more information on configuration, send me an email to andreja.jarc[at]meinberg.de or visit our website at www.meinbergglobal.com.

  • share 
  • share  
  • share 

Related posts:

  1. PTP in networks without timing support
  2. NTP Monitoring
  3. Use Cases for Timing in Power Grids
  4. HOW to use redundancy for your NTP network
Previous Post - What’s in the 2019 edition of IEEE 1588: Mixed Multicast Unicast Operation
Next Post - What’s in the IEEE 1588 revision: Interdomain interactions

Filed Under: Configuration Guidelines, IEEE 1588, Industry Applications

Comments

  1. Nilesh Joshi says

    January 25, 2019 at 3:41 pm

    Thanks for excellent article

    Reply

Discussion Area:

If you enjoyed this post, or have any questions left, feel free to leave a comment or question below.

Share Your Comments & Feedback Cancel reply

PTP Software

  • PTP Track HoundPTP / IEEE 1588 Protocol Analyzer

  • NTP / PTP Simulation Software
  • Meinberg Advertisement

    Categories

    • Authors
    • Configuration Guidelines
    • IEEE 1588
    • IEEE 1952
    • Industry Applications
    • NTP
    • Security

    External Links

  • NTP Security
    • Site Notice
    • Privacy Policy

    You may also like

    1. PTP in networks without timing support
    2. NTP Monitoring
    3. Use Cases for Timing in Power Grids
    4. HOW to use redundancy for your NTP network

    © 2025 · Time Synchronization Blog

    MENU
    • PTP / IEEE 1588
    • NTP
    • Configuration Guidelines
    • Industry Applications
    • Security