Time Synchronization

Time Synchronization
News & Tutorials from Meinberg
  • PTP / IEEE 1588
  • NTP
  • Configuration Guidelines
  • Industry Applications
  • Security
Home » IEEE 1952 » IEEE 1952 PNT Resilience Levels: Resist

IEEE 1952 PNT Resilience Levels: Resist

February 10, 2025 by Douglas Arnold Leave a Comment

Five Minute Facts about Packet Timing

I’d like to tell you something about the next IEEE P1952 resilience level in our series. If you missed it, I have been posting about the proposed resilience levels from the IEEE P1952 project. Today’s topic is resilience level 3: Resist.

For PNT equipment Resist means to continue working, with acceptable performance for some period time. For Navigation that might mean dead reckoning assisted by accelerometers. For timing system that means holdover with an oscillator. Clocks in holdover get less accurate over time since the holdover oscillator is imperfect and drifts off frequency over time. The amount time you can holdover with acceptable time error depends on the stability of the oscillator and the strictness of you applications timing requirements. I described how holdover works and how to select a holdover oscillator in a previous blog post.

If you have a network that supports Synchronous Ethernet (SyncE) then devices on the network can improve their holdover time by locking their local oscillator to the frequency of the SyncE source, which usually has a better local oscillator. This is shown in Figure 1. As an aside, PTP time transfer accuracy generally improves when the PTP timeReceiver and GM are frequency locked at the physical layer.

Figure 1. A PTP network with SyncE provided by the GM


One problem with the network in Figure 1, is that if the reason the timeReceiver is in holdover is a problem with the GM, then SyncE might also be unavailable. Figure 2 shows a PTP network where the source of SyncE is different than the PTP GM. If the GM fails in this case, then the timeReceiver can still locks its local oscillator to the source of SyncE.

See also  IEEE 1952 PNT Resilience Levels: Detecting Adversities


If you have any questions about network timing, don’t hesitate to send me an email at doug.arnold@meinberg-usa.com, or visit our website at www.meinbergglobal.com.


  • share 
  • share  
  • share 

Related posts:

  1. Tales from the ISPCS Plugfest
  2. What Are All Of These IEEE 1588 Clock Types?
  3. End-to-End Versus Peer-to-Peer
  4. Using SNMP to Manage Network Time Servers
Previous Post - IEEE 1952 PNT Resilience Levels: Recovery
Next Post - IEEE 1952 PNT Resilience Levels: Withstand

Filed Under: IEEE 1952

Discussion Area:

If you enjoyed this post, or have any questions left, feel free to leave a comment or question below.

Share Your Comments & Feedback Cancel reply

PTP Software

  • PTP Track HoundPTP / IEEE 1588 Protocol Analyzer

  • NTP / PTP Simulation Software
  • Meinberg Advertisement

    Categories

    • Authors
    • Configuration Guidelines
    • IEEE 1588
    • IEEE 1952
    • Industry Applications
    • NTP
    • Security

    External Links

  • NTP Security
    • Site Notice
    • Privacy Policy

    You may also like

    1. Tales from the ISPCS Plugfest
    2. What Are All Of These IEEE 1588 Clock Types?
    3. End-to-End Versus Peer-to-Peer
    4. Using SNMP to Manage Network Time Servers

    © 2025 · Time Synchronization Blog

    MENU
    • PTP / IEEE 1588
    • NTP
    • Configuration Guidelines
    • Industry Applications
    • Security